10 Comments
Jun 6Liked by miles.mcstylez

Over here in the UK we have the Very Left Labour who kneel to Saint George and are happy for men to compete in women's sports and unlimited immigration Vs Labour Lite, otherwise known as the Conservatives who Kneel for Saint George, are fighting against The Gender Bull shit and like unlimited Immigration. Not much of a choice really lol.

There is a third option but the MSN here has such a hold that they've convinced people that if they vote for that third option then they're an ist/phobe/bigot.

I'm voting for the third option.

Expand full comment

One of the best pieces I've read this year, not just in your break down of the bipolar equation before us, but where we've come as a civilization, at this point in time.

We continually see the same patterns repeat, in new and improved livery, but they're the same.

What's comforting is that in most cases, populism gets the upper hand, even if only for a brief respite. To be sure there are many insults, abuses and woes ahead, but as Steve Bannon alludes to- "people have had a bellyful and are starting to believe their lying eyes - see what you see".

Restacking this work.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks! Always appreciate the restacks

Expand full comment

Start here:

Dear Mr. / Madam School Board Trustee

I write to you today in a sincere effort to help you accomplish your noble goals for seeking this office.

That is to help you facilitate the betterment of our schools for our children and young people.

To do this, I ask you to make the Board meeting agenda and the data points behind them available to me as well as all of the other taxpayers.

Upload the stack to a server where we can read, ratify and or annul the elements after log on.

In a perfect world each paragraph must have at least three possible answers: agree, disagree, no opinion at this time.

Direct democracy is a growing trend, and many companies offer these services:

hosting, voter receipts, and a running tally of totals for everyone to see.

In this way Madam Trustee you are assured that you will always have the strength of the community with you when making the decisions that really do effect the lives of our people.

Vty,

Helpful Taxpayer Citizen

Hosting Companies:

https://teletownhall.com/products/text-to-online-surveys/

https://publicinput.com/wp/online-town-hall/

https://www.govtech.com/archive/introducing-the-21st-century-city-hall.html

Expand full comment

I love your essays — very well argued and full of interesting links!

Expand full comment

But it will not be a tyranny of & for 'white people' in the end. It will come to encompass all. It's true such laws affect only whites, but the tyranny will affect everyone.

Expand full comment

... this demon-sanctioned tyranny. I believe the globalists couldn't mount this push for absolute control. The outright evil of it, & how it will blanket globe if we fail, that to memens there is metaphysical evil behind this.

Expand full comment

What will the fallback position be if the populist movement fails. B/c we cannot, must not submit. Tens of generations now gone, & tens more in the future are depending on us rolling back this deon-sanctioned tyranny.

Expand full comment
author

Secession basically.

Expand full comment

If I may, I'd like to add another category to the people vs elite-arguement:

The laconic man.

(Or vagina-carrier [which sounds like a truly terrifying naval vessel] or whatever the term for woman is this week.)

The man who might be a career-criminal or a small business owner or a craftsman, mechanic, or whatever sector where you do real work for real results. The laconic attitude being that this man might pay lip service to whatever -ism and overlord has fought his way to the top of the dunghill, and might even pay a modicum of tax just to stay off the radar. The man who doesn't challenge the Capitalist State in the slightest, but who dodges it. Who is smart, resourceful and primarily artful in not being a part of society without the puerile public tantrums of neo-marxists or libertarians.

We do exist you see, but we don't make an issue of it, as that would run counter to our mien, to our fibre of being and character, moral or otherwise.

Another point (good essays such as yours provoke thoughts and thoughts must be shared to really exist) is about all these regulations of mind and feeling and perception and expression:

They only ever apply to white people (to use the USAmerican vernacular).

A palestinian in Germany calling for an Endlösung re: Israel and jews in general does not go to prison. A somali imam in Sweden preaching that women are inferior and must be beaten, or that homos must be killed is not brought up on hate crime charges. And so on, I could list examples hypothetical as well as real until my beard falls off my sun-bleached skull.

Only "white" people are affected and afflicted by these laws. Even when applying a law in a race-based manner (again, using the USAmerican lingo) is unconstitutional.

The words everyone opposing these measures in all of our respective nations are avoiding are these:

Race War. It is the Rest vs the West, where the leaders (all categories) of the West wages war on their own peoples and cultures, using the Rest as Sturmsoldaten, turning the young into jannissaries, and recruiting from the invaders their Palatine Guards.

End goal? To stay on top of the dung-heap of course, no matter how.

Hence, the laconic attitude. Not checking out, not becoming nihilist or relativist, just being smart and artful about it; 'it' being your business of the day.

Expand full comment